Page 309 - Freshwater-Biology-and-Ecology-Handbook

43. Walley, W.J. and Hawkes, H.A. 1997. A computer-based development 61. Robertson, AL, T Johns, JWN Smith and GS Proudlove. 2008.
of the Biological Monitoring Working Party score system incorporating A review of the subterranean aquatic ecology of England and Wales.
abundance rating, site type and indicator value., Water research, Vol. 31, Bristol : Science report SC030155/SR20. Environment Agency: pp viii
pp. 201-210. + 57.
44. Wright, J.F., Sutcliffe, D.W. and Furse, M.T. 2000. Assessing the 62. Buss, S, Z Cai, B Cardenas, J Fleckenstein, D Hannah, K Heppell,
biological quality of fresh waters. RIVPACS and other techniques. P Hulme, T Ibrahim, D Kaeser, S Krause, D Lawler, D Lerner, J
Ambleside, England : Freshwater Biological Association. Mant and I Malcolm. 2009.The Hyporheic Handbook: A handbook
on the groundwater-surface water interface and hyporheic zone for
45. National Rivers Authority. 1994.The quality of rivers and canals in environmental managers. Bristol : Science Report: SC050070 -
England and Wales as assessed by a new general quality assessment Environment Agency.
Scheme. s.l. : National Rivers Authority, Water Quality Series No. 19.
HMSO. 63. Pipan, T and DC Culver. 2005. Estimating biodiversity in the epikarstic
zone of a West Virginia cave., Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, Vol. 67,
46. P J Newman, M A Proveaux and RA Sweeting. 1991. River Quality, pp. 103 -109.
Ecological assessment and control. Brussels : s.n.
64. Knight, LRFD, A Lewington and G Proudlove. In Press. Subterranean
47. Clarke, R. and Davy-Bowker, J. 2014. River invertebrate classification biology in Great Britain and Ireland: Characterising a [predominantly]
tool science development project: modifications for WHPT and other post-glacial subterranean biota, British Cave Research Association.
abundance-weighted indices a report to the Scottish Environment
Protection Agency. s.l. : Freshwater Biology Association. 65. Webb, JR, KJ Gething, CC Kratz, J England, AL Drewitt and R
Stubbington. 2022. A standardized multi-method survey to enhance
48. Wasson J-G, Chandesris A, Garcia-Bautista A, Pella H, Villeneuve characterization of riparian invertebrate communities. . s.l. : Water and
B. 2006. European Hydro-Ecoregions. REBECCA Work Package 4: Environment Journal, 2022, Vol. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12775.
Rivers. Deliverable D 14: Report on relations linking pressures, chemistry
and biology in rivers and too. s.l. : National Environmental Research 66. Drake, CM, DA Lott, KNA Alexander and J Webb . 2007. Surveying
Institute, Denmark. terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates for conservation evaluation.
Natural England Research Report NERR005. Peterborough : English
49. Clarke RT, Davy-Bowker J. 2006.Development of the scientific Nature.
rationale and formulae for altering RIVPACS predicted indices for
WFD Reference Condition. Final report. Edinburgh : SNIFFER Project 67. Sadler, JP and D Bell. 2000. A comparative site assessment of
WFD72b. pp. 62 + ix appendices. exposed riverine (ERS) beetles in South-West England. Peterborough. :
English Nature Research Reports, No. 383.
50. WFD-UKTAG. 2014. UKTAG River Assessment Method, Benthic
Invertebrate Fauna, Whalley, Hawkes, Paisley and Trigg (WHPT) Metric in 68. Sadler, J.P. and Petts G.E. 2000. Invertebrates of Exposed Riverine
River Invertebrate Classification Tool (RICT). s.l. : UK Technical Advisory Sediments – Phase 2: Sampling Considerations. Bristol : Environment
Group. Agency: 112.
51. McFarland, B. 2010. Developing typology and class boundaries 69. Webb, JR, A Drewitt and N Mott. 2017. Guidelines for Riparian Beetle
for WFD-AWICsp to assess acidification in UK rivers using Surveys incorporating site quality assessment via Pantheon. Natural
macroinvertebrates. Report to the UK TAG Freshwater Task Team. http:// England Protocol. . Peterborough : Natural England.
www.wfduk.org/sites/default/files/AWICsp%20Report%20March%2.
s.l. : UK Technical Advisory Group. 70. Magand, C, MH Alves, E Calleja, T Datry, G Dörflinger, J England, A
Munne, I Tziortzis. 2020. Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral streams:
52. Cantrell KJ, Serkiz SM, Perdue EM. 1990. Evaluation of acid- what water managers need to know. Technical report – Cost ACTION CA
neutralising capacity data for solutions containing natural organic acids. 15113. 10.5281/zenodo.3888474.
Geochim Cosmochim, Vol. 54, pp. 1247 -1254.
71. Washington, H.G. 1984. Diversity, Biotic and similarity indices. A review
53. WFD-UKTAG. 2014. River Assesment Method, Benthic Invertebrate with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems., Water Research, Vol. 18 ,
Fauna - Invetebrates (anthropogenic Acidification): WFD Acid Water pp. 653-694.
Indicator Community. Stirling : UK-TAG.
72. Green, RH. 1979. Sampling design and statistical methods for
54. European Union. 2018. Commission Decision (EU) 2018/229 of 12 environmental biologists. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
February 2018 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member 73. Pielou, EC. 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. New York :
State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration John Wiley and Sons.
exercise and repealing Commission Decision 2013/480/EU. 74. Pielou, EC. 1975. Ecological Diversity. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
55. Moe S.J, Schatau A.K, Bækken T, Mcfarland B. 2010. Assessing 75. Pielou, EC. 1977.Mathematical Ecology. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
macroinvertebrate metrics for classifying acidified rivers across northern
Europe. 7, Freshwater Biology, Vol. 55, pp. 1382–1404. 76. Sládeček, K. 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of
view. 1-IV, Archiv für Hydrobiologie Ergebnisse der Limnologie, Vol. 7,
56. Hellawell, JM. 1978.Biological Surveillance of Rivers. Stevenage : Water pp. 1 - 218.
Research Centre.
77. Washington, HG. 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: A review
57. Hauer, R & G.A. Lamberti. 2017. Methods in Stream Ecology, 3rd edn. with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems., Water Research, , Vol. 18,
Volume 1: Ecosystem Structure; Volume 2: Ecosystem Function. s.l. : pp. 653-694.
Academic Press.
78. Hawkes, H.A. 1998. Origin and development of the biological monitoring
58. Institution, British Standards. 2012. Water quality — Guidelines working party score system, Water research, Vol. 32, pp. 964-968.
for the selection of sampling methods and devices for benthic
macroinvertebrates in fresh waters (ISO 10870:2012). s.l. : British 79. Herman, MR & AP Nejadhashemi. 2015. A review of
Standards Institution. macroinvertebrate- and fish- based stream health indices. Ecohydrology
& Hydrobiology, Vol. 15, pp. 53 -67.
59. Green, RH. 1979. Sampling design and statistical methods for
environmental biologists. University of Ohio : John Whiley and Sons. 80. Maitland, P.S. 1977. A Coded checklist of animals occurring in
freshwater in the British Isles. Edinburgh : Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
60. Pritchard EG, DDA Chadwick, IR Patmore, M Chadwick, P Bradley,
CD Sayer and JA Axmacher. 2021.The Pritchard Trap, a novel 81. Wegl, R. 1983. Index für Limnosarobitat., Wasser und Abwasser, Vol. 26,
quantitative survey method for fish. Ecological Solutions and Evidence., pp. 1 - 175.
Ecological Solutions and Evidence, Vol. 2.

Freshwater Biology and Ecology Handbook | 309
–